How Sologen’s plan to turn abandoned oil and gas wells into geothermal power producers could replace coal power in Texas.
Two weeks ago, San Antonio resident Frank Smith signed a letter of intent to purchase an abandoned oil well in Brazoria County. But it’s not the oil he’s interested in; it’s the super-heated water at the bottom of the pipe that he hopes to run through a turbine on the surface, turning it into a reliable source of electricity to feed into Texas’ straining power grid. The well would take only a few months to set up, requires no toxic chemicals, and gives off no air pollution. Best of all, a researcher at one of the most prominent geothermal labs in the country thinks the technology Smith and a handful of others in Texas are investing in today could be rapidly duplicated at abandoned and closed oil wells across much of the state — ultimately providing enough energy to displace dozens of coal plants by 2050.
“I could never leave Texas and retire a billionaire,” boasts a confident Smith, owner of the SA-based clean-energy outfit Sologen. “But that’s not the goal. The goal is to seed an industry.”
The need for power in Texas was prominently on display last week, as triple-digit August temperatures and corresponding record-setting energy use hit the state hard day after sweat-soaked day. The operator of the bulk of the state’s power grid — the Electric Reliability Council of Texas — called for voluntary energy reductions between the peak-use hours of 3 p.m. and 7 p.m., and still we broke new state records three days in a row, topping out at more than 2,500 megawatts above last summer’s previous high of 65,776 megawatts. We would have broken the record again last Thursday if ERCOT hadn’t declared a Stage 2 emergency and called on industrial partners to shut down up to 1,000 megawatts of power to avoid rolling blackouts.
San Antonio-owned CPS Energy also encouraged conservation, tweeting last Thursday: “Here we go again... Heat continues to put strain on state electric grid. Conserve any way you can…”
While much of the electricity provided during the hottest times of the day is made by quick-firing natural gas, the bulk of power consumed in Texas is provided by coal. And even as state utilities struggle to meet the unprecedented demands of record-breaking temps and rising populations, coal power — indicted in everything from increased heart attacks, asthma cases, and weather-weirding climate change — is increasingly under assault. As the U.S. EPA continues to fight Texas over greenhouse gas emissions the state’s leadership refuses to regulate, new rules rolled out last month require fast reductions of soot and lung-damaging nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide — reductions that will inevitably lead to many older coal plants shuttering.
CPS Energy, already committed to closing down its oldest and dirtiest coal plant, JT Deely, years early, doesn’t expect to be able to meet the EPA’s deadline for bringing its next oldest coal plant, the Spruce 1, into compliance. In a letter to the EPA last fall, Angela Donaubauer Rodriguez, environmental and sustainability manager at CPS Energy, wrote the EPA that the lower limits for nitrogen oxides could not be met by Spruce 1. In a second letter, dated February 7, 2011, she wrote the new lower limits could be met, but not without “significant modifications,” and not by the EPA’s deadline of January 2012. And if coal is not a sure bet for future baseload power needs, neither is nuclear.
The utility’s push to double the South Texas Project nuclear complex was roughly buffeted by issues of high cost and lack of transparency among partners — but it was only iced when Japan’s multi-meltdown Fukushima disaster set the entire nuclear industry reeling.
Today CPS expects to meet future growth through the construction of new natural gas units and continued investment in renewables like solar. But until big strides are made in energy storage, the renewables won’t be able to do the city’s heavy lifting of raising our baseload power, the stuff that runs 24 hours a day no matter if the wind blows or the sun shines.
While Cris Eugster, CPS Energy’s chief sustainability officer, is hopeful that future research and development projects could make solar and wind (especially when paired with better energy management overall) more like reliable baseload energy, he recognizes it’s not there yet. And while geothermal has that coveted consistency on its side, it hasn’t been proven in the field. “It’s consistent from the get-go,” Eugster said, “but it’s not as far along as solar or wind. You can go to a wind farm right now, see it and feel it; you can’t do that with geothermal.”
For that reason, the handful of companies that have come calling in the hopes of securing commitments from CPS to buy their power (the way CPS committed to purchase 200 megawatts a year from the experimental “clean” coal plant to be built outside Odessa) have been turned away.
Smith, however, they’ll be watching with what could be called an interested detachment. Geothermal today is “almost like the venture capital world, and we’re not a venture capital firm,” said Eugster. “It’s very exciting technology, but really it’s something someone has to prove out there first.”
Smith is not your typical green-energy booster. He’s a businessman. An entrepreneur. He said he was inspired by former mayor Phil Hardberger’s unveiling of Mission Verde at 2009’s State of the City address, not for the chance to clean up the air, or do a good deed, but by the dollars involved. Considering the city’s newly launched sustainability program was calling for massive investment in energy efficiency and solar power, efforts now gaining muscle mass under the leadership of Mayor Julián Castro, Smith remembers thinking: “That’s $2 billion in work and you want to do that in how many years?”
Previously, Smith says he had moved between healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and computers. The “greenest” project he’d tackled before he calculated the potential profits involved in Hardberger’s vision was a propane-powered weed whacker. (Puffing on a cigar inside the Quarry Market’s Club Humidor, he pauses, an eyebrow cocked, as if asking “Perhaps you’ve heard of it?”)
If he’s trying to sell me on the solar side of his business, he’s doing a terrible job. “The problem with renewables, A-to-Z, is that they don’t work without subsidies and incentives,” he says. “And solar’s the worst,”
Yet, as long as the incentives are in place it’s a no-brainer. Smith says he recently installed a $200,000 system that ended up costing his client a mere $6,000 once all the federal, state, and local incentives and rebates were applied. The system today produces an average of $4,800 in energy every year. Talk about payback.
But it’s the heat of the earth — specifically a form of geothermal found across the Gulf Coast from Texas to Florida, geopressure — that has him most excited. Geopressure resources are typically found in deep salty aquifers trapped under enormous pressure. Either the steam or the heat of the water is used to drive turbine generators and create electricity. Smith plans to co-generate electricity at his site by also separating and using the methane found in the water.
And his project is worth watching, if for no other reason than because it’s been done before. None other than the U.S. Department of Energy tested a similar well in Brazoria County in the 1980s (Smith is close, but won’t say how close, to that original site) when the agency showed unequivocally that the heat of the earth from geopressure could be converted into electricity. In that investigation, part of a larger DOE campaign begun in the 1970s fueled by national interest in reducing dependence on Middle East oil, operators generated a single megawatt of electricity over six months from both the super-heated water and the natural gas captured and separated from the water. While the electricity couldn’t compete with coal at the time in terms of cost, the project also showed that geopressure could serve as a sustained energy resource: The well was flow-tested over five years, according to Maria Richards, researcher and lab coordinator at Southern Methodist University’s Geothermal Laboratory, without any significant reduction in flow. “They were able to prove that it is a lasting source,” she said.
In the years since the DOE project, called Pleasant Bayou #2, two things have happened that suggest geothermal may be ready for commercialization in Texas. First, the technology has advanced to the point that even lower-temperature waters in the 100- to 300-degree range (which is most of the state’s geothermal capacity) can be effectively used. Second, researchers have mapped out geothermal’s presence across the state, taking much of the guesswork out of the process of deciding where to drill or which wells to re-enter.
While solitary geothermal wells tend to generate a relatively small amount of power, Richards envisions geothermal wells taking over abandoned oil and gas fields the way a field of wind turbines covers a landscape, collectively producing a traditional power plant’s load of continuous energy. In that way, she sees the technology displacing coal plants in the decades ahead. “That’s the neat thing about geothermal: It is baseload. It can be something that can be scaled up. It can really compete with a coal plant,” Richards said.
But even as she says it, she hesitates. “For the most part, geothermal is going to start out small, like a wind turbine. Where you have a field of oil and gas wells, there’s no reason not to expect that in the future that field could be turned into a heat-exchange mechanism.”
Even active drilling operations could reroute what drillers typically view as wastewater through a turbine to make energy as they drill. Because of the heavy mineral content, state law requires the groundwater to be reinjected beneath the surface as waste, but at least one driller in Mississippi has already tapped into the non-traditional revenue stream, Richards said.
Geothermal’s “plus” column grows long in a report for the DOE by an MIT-assembled panel in 2005. “Because EGS [Enhanced Geothermal Systems] plants have a small footprint and can operate essentially emissions-free,” the team wrote, “the overall environmental impact of EGS power facilities is likely to be positive, reducing the growth of greenhouse gas emissions while providing a reliable and safe source of electricity.”
With 3,100 installed geothermal megawatts being generated in the U.S. annually, there are still no commercial operations in Texas. Still, Richards is optimistic, saying she expects to see the state generating “hundreds of megawatts” in the next few years and “tens of thousands” of megawatts by 2050. Smith, by comparison, is absolutely bullish. He sees the potential for geothermal to meet a full half of all the state’s power needs. And he says he’ll be able to sell it in a matter for months for less than nine cents a kilowatt-hour (more than coal, if you don’t factor in the cost of building the coal plant, but less than solar). Though he’s still pursuing subsidies, he insists he can make a profit without them.
Richards hopes more traditional oil and gas companies will get involved. “They have a lot of the technology already, they have a lot of understanding of the earth. For them it is more of a slam-dunk than for someone coming from wind or solar or wanting to invest in something new.”
Russel E. Smith, executive director of the Texas Renewable Energy Industries Association, said geothermal and other renewables could be slowed by massive federal spending cuts on the way. “I’m afraid there will be definitely some stalling. But, you know, economics and politics have a way of changing on a dime. You never know what’s going to happen next.”
If anything, the dire economic conditions offer Frank Smith and Sologen the perfect opportunity to prove his claims under less-than-ideal conditions. Speaking from the road to Houston on Tuesday, he said he’d be producing electricity at his first 2.5-megawatt well in about four months. He plans to rapidly duplicate the process at 400 of 5,000 abandoned oil and gas wells his team found usable along the Gulf Coast’s geopressure zone to produce more than a gigawatt of energy within six years — or one and a half times the power of a typical coal plant.
“At the end of the day, we become the insurance policy to the oil and gas industry,” Frank Smith said. “Rather than spending potentially $100,000 to plug a well, they may turn it over to us and we convert it. Once this actually takes off and we become known in the industry, it really becomes transformative.”
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
San Antonio, TX, November 1, 2012
Brundage Management’s A-AAAKey Mini Storage Is
San Antonio’s Largest Solar Owner
A-AAAKey Mini Storage Installs 474 kW of Solar Energy
Brundage Management Company’s A-AAAKey Mini Storage has installed 474 kW of solar energy systems at 9 of their San Antonio area climate controlled storage facilities. The combined capacity of 474 kW makes Brundage Management the largest owner of “net metered” solar energy in San Antonio.
The initial 39.6 kW system was installed in the Spring of 2011 and evaluated on the system’s electricity production and financial savings during the Summer and Fall 2011. Based on system’s performance, the decision was made to expand at the initial location as well as install systems at 7 additional climate controlled locations across the San Antonio area. In June 2012, additional expansions were started at each of the existing locations as well as an initial system at a newly constructed storage facility to bring their total to 474kW.
According to Bert Denson, Brundage Management’s VP of Operations and Maintenance, “These solar energy systems will allow us to control our electricity costs for years to come while electricity rates rise over time.”
SoloGen Systems, a clean energy developer worked with Self Reliant Solar, a CPS Energy certified solar installer to provide Brundage Management with a turnkey solution that included the project designs, rebate applications/processing, installations, permitting, inspections and US Treasury Grant processing.
Brundage Management Company, Inc. (BMC) performs all management functions from its headquarters in San Antonio, TX. BMC provides management services for Sun Loan Company and A-AAA Key Mini Storage in thirteen states and Mexico.
SoloGen Systems, LLC is a San Antonio-based clean energy developer with solar energy, geothermal and water conservation business units. SoloGen specializes in solar energy systems for businesses in San Antonio and Austin.
Self Reliant Solar brings extensive expertise in solar panel power design and installation, plus unrivaled experience in electrical energy and alternative energy battery storage for homeowners, businesses and rural energy power users, such as concert producers and oil rigs.
ACQUIRED FROM MARKETPLACE.ORG
Jeremy Hobson:In the energy business there are
renewables like wind and solar. And there are non-renewables -- like
oil. Once you use up the oil that's in the well. That's it. Well,
actually, a few researchers and entrepreneurs in Texas say that's not
Andrew Oxford reports.
- The current design of the wholesale power market in Texas will not
encourage needed investment in new power plants, the Brattle Group said
in a report commissioned by the state electric grid operator.
Texas electric regulators and the grid agency that oversees the $34 billion deregulated wholesale market are working to encourage construction of new generation in the state, which has little ability to import power from its neighbors.
Unlike many areas of the United States, electric demand in Texas continues to grow because of the state's healthy economy.
"Electric reliability matters to all of us and we must remain focused on the central question of whether we are doing enough to guarantee an adequate power supply," said Craven Crowell, chairman of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
ERCOT, which oversees the grid for most of the state, has warned that the prospect for rolling blackouts in future years will increase as the power supply is unable to keep pace with growing demand.
Low wholesale prices and tight financial markets have stalled development of new generation in Texas even as more stringent environmental rules threaten to shut older coal- and gas-fired plants over the next few years.
"The cold hard fact is that new power plants will not be built unless power prices support that build," said Bill Nordlund, managing director of Panda Power Funds. Panda has two natural gas-fired plants primed for construction in Texas.
Last summer's protracted heat wave, which triggered record electricity demand and six emergency declarations from ERCOT, intensified the need to address the state's shrinking power reserve margin, the cushion needed to avoid blackouts.
The report by the Brattle Group, a power industry consultant, did not recommend a specific course of action to modify ERCOT's "energy-only" market, which pays generators only when they produce power, but outlined five options along with advantages and disadvantages of each.
Brattle principal Sam Newell said the energy-only market has worked well to attract generation investment in Texas, but low wholesale prices now will not encourage as many new megawatts as regulators believe are necessary to meet a 13.75 percent reserve margin in the summer when electric use soars.
Newell said Texans should reexamine that reserve target given the fact that power line problems are the cause of many more outages than supply shortages.
"You can plan on a very high level of reserves and almost never, ever have to shed load, but that would be more expensive than maintaining a lower reserve margin," Newell said on a call with reporters. "There's got to be a balance somewhere. We think it's worth re-evaluating those standards."
If the commission decides the state requires a higher reserve margin than the energy-only margin will provide, Brattle offered several potential solutions.
Options included keeping the energy-only design, but adding a market-based reserve margin; higher prices to support a target reserve margin; or a back-stop procurement process to maintain minimum acceptable reliability.
Other options included a mandatory resource adequacy requirement for companies that supply power to customers, or having a resource-adequacy requirement with a centralized forward capacity market.
While the Texas Public Utility Commission has resisted calls to create a capacity market similar to those used in other U.S. power markets, the Brattle report addressed a number of criticisms that capacity markets simply boost overall costs that benefit existing generation owners without attracting new power plants.
The PUC and ERCOT have already implemented a number of market changes, including raising the price cap on wholesale power when supplies are scarce, to encourage construction of new power plants.
"The Brattle Group's report confirms that we are moving in the right direction," said Donna Nelson, PUC chairman.
Unlike what the commission has proposed, however, the Brattle Group advised ERCOT to gradually increase the wholesale price cap to $9,000 per megawatt-hour from $3,000 MWh, reaching $9,000 only in extreme scarcity when power to customers is being curtailed. These prices would be paid by the suppliers who serve homes and businesses.
"We like scarcity prices to progress over a range instead of jumping to the cap (because) with a smoother price curve, you have better market behavior and it will work better with demand response," Newell said.
The report warned that simply increasing price caps will not attract more generation.
"Many market participants that were supportive of the commission's actions so far were wary of the prospect of raising caps much higher," the report said.
The Sierra Club criticized the report for its limited look at energy efficiency and conservation options where customers are paid to reduce power use when supplies are strained.
"Instead of using our money to build more coal and gas plants, the PUC should implement their rules proposed to raise energy efficiency goals," said Cyrus Reed, conservation director of the Lone Star Chapter of the Sierra Club.
The Brattle report said expanded demand-response programs will be needed, but that over the long-term the state will have to see new power plants built.
Reed also called on the state to increase use of renewable power, such as solar. Texas is already the No. 1 state for wind generation.
The Brattle Group noted that growth of wind power in Texas has depressed wholesale prices to the point that generators cannot justify investment in new gas-fired power plants.
John Ragan, president of NRG Energy's ( NRG.N ) Gulf Coast region, complemented regulators and ERCOT for seeking "expert, external analysis of the different options Texas can implement to encourage greater resource adequacy while maintaining a strong commitment to competition and regulatory certainty."
"I am confident that we can address the issues that we face," Ragan said.
By Carl Franzen
A new report on the state of the solar industry in America indicates that despite a global oversupply and a potential trade war with China , the U.S. solar industry had its second-best quarter ever in terms of installations, during the first quarter of 2012.
The number of installations, 506 megawatts worth, enough to power just over 350,000 homes , was bested only by the fourth quarter of 2011, which saw a whopping 708 megawatts worth of solar installed.
On top of that, the report , drafted by clean-energy market analysis firm GTM Research and the Solar Energy Industries Association and released Tuesday, a trade group, forecasts that total U.S. installed solar power will increase 75 percent his year alone, with 3.3 gigawatts-worth of solar power installed, compared to the 4.4 gigawatts that are currently installed in the country and were added over years of development.
“This will be by far the largest year we’ve ever had for solar in the U.S.,” said Shayle Kann , vice president of research at GTM , in a phone interview with TPM. “Relative to expectations, the first quarter was very strong. We saw both the commercial and residential markets grow.”
Indeed, commercial solar installations, those put in place on corporate properties, accounted for the overwhelming majority’s worth of solar power installed in the quarter — 288.8 megawatts, according to the GTM and SEIA U.S. Solar Market Insight report .
Furthermore, residential power installations (those installed on homes) accounted for 93.9 megawatts. The final category, utilities power installations, or solar put in place by power companies, accounted for 123.6 megawatts of installations, but that number was actually a steep decline from both the third and fourth quarters of 2011.
However, as the report points out, “direct comparisons between these two quarters [fourth and first] carry little meaning,” because “construction timelines for a relatively few large projects can cause large swings from quarter to quarter more than any underlying market dynamics.”
In essence: The natural construction cycle for solar projects and other power installations, governed by weather and the fiscal year, means that generally, utilities won’t be installing solar panels in larger numbers until later in the year, so long as they have those projects already lined up, “in the pipeline,” as it were.
“The pipeline is still huge,” Kann told TPM.
Intriguingly, when it came to the state-by-state breakdown for solar installations for the first quarter of 2012, New Jersey lead the nation in solar installations, with a whopping 173.8 megawatts of solar power generation capacity installed in the three month period. California, more commonly associated with solar, was second with 148.4 megawatts.
“New Jersey has been a leader in solar for years thanks to good state level policy,” Kann explained, “That’s the most important thing.”
Kann pointing to the state’s Solar Renewable Energy Certificates (SREC) program , which allows solar installation owner to sell credits on a competitive state market , credits earned for every 1,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity every single project generates. He said that other states were wise to follow in New Jersey’s path.
At the same time, domestic solar manufacturing took a hit as prices for some solar panel arrays plummeted by 47 percent over the same quarter last year.
The manufacturing downturn was taken as proof positive by the Coalition For Solar Manufacturing, a trade grouped formed specifically to petition the U.S. government to slap tariffs on Chinese imports of cheap solar panels, which the group says were illegally subsidized and dumped. The Commerce Department did find some Chinese companies guilty of illegally subsidizing and dumping , and did end up imposing tariffs.
As Gordon Brisner, president of SolarWorld America, the lead company in CASM, said in a statement distributed to reporters this week: “The sharp drop in U.S. solar manufacturing, even as demand in the United States grows, is powerful evidence of injury caused by unfair Chinese trade practices.”
Kann said that just because there was a global oversupply of solar panels driving down the price didn’t mean that China was necessarily dumping, though.
“Manufacturers across the globe didn’t prepare well,” Kann told TPM. “They kept producing even when their inventory was really high, which lead to a drastic market correction,” i.e., the falling price of solar panel modules.
Still, Kann said that the overall picture of the U.S. solar industry remained bright.
“We’re expecting see growth in all three sectors: residential, commercial and utilities,” Kann added.
How Sologen’s plan to turn abandoned oil and gas wells into geothermal power producers could replace coal power in Texas.
Miles below Texas are zones of hot, pressurized brine that for decades posed a liability to drillers and rendered oil and gas wells worthless.
Now, new wildcatters are going after those same pools in the name of green energy. They want to use the pressure and heat to make electricity.
If successful, they will introduce a new source of clean power to the grid that has the potential to exceed all other sources.
According to a report by the Southern Methodist University Geothermal Laboratory, the hot water and pressure between 8,000 and 25,000 feet below Texas could supply more than 100 times the state's 2008 total electric consumption for well over a century.
The concept and technology of using the hot water from old oil and gas wells have been around in various forms since the 1960s. Since then, more than half a million oil and gas wells have been drilled in Texas.
The challenge always has been to make electricity production economical from those wells.
This summer, a Houston company will give it a try at a well in Liberty County. Also, a San Antonio company is working on financing a project to produce more than 100 megawatts in 12 months.
They and a handful of other companies have the support of the federal and state governments. A new state law provides tax incentives to companies producing electricity from oil and gas wells.
The Texas Public Utility Commission is working on rules to kick-start the geothermal market by requiring utilities to buy more clean energy. The commission did the same thing for wind power development, which is one reason Texas now is a national leader in wind energy production.
The federal government is issuing grants, including several in Texas, to accelerate the development of the geothermal market.
“There are millions of wells across the country and hundreds of thousands in Texas,” said Tim Reinhardt , who specializes in low-temperature geothermal development at the U.S. Energy Department . “We feel that this is a great thing.”
Southern Methodist University received $5 million to create a national geothermal database cataloging the millions of wells drilled across the country that could be used to generate electricity.
The U.S. Energy Department is investing another $5 million in El Paso County for the research and development of a geothermal system using new wells to produce electricity for Fort Bliss. The work is part of the post's effort to become self-sufficient.
“It's like gambling,” said Jon Lear , who works for a contractor on the Fort Bliss project. “You put a lot of chips out on a lot of different squares.”
This summer, George Alcorn , a third-generation oil and gas man, is setting out to prove he is worth betting on as he starts a demonstration project on a well outside Houston.
In 2008, with oil prices at record lows, Alcorn told his father he was doing the unthinkable and going green by opening up abandoned gas wells, not for the gas but for the 250-degree water that would gush to the surface. The hot liquid then would be used to create steam and turn a turbine before being injected back into the earth.
“I think a lot of guys his age and generation just can't fathom such an event,” Alcorn said of his 77-year-old father. “He's old school.”
Alcorn plans to start reconfiguring an abandoned 13,000-foot-deep gas well in Liberty County. He calls the well a “typical well,” in that it doesn't have exceptionally high temperatures or pressure. The idea is that if geothermal power can work on this well, this same technology could be applied to thousands of others.
He has the backing of a $1.5 million matching federal grant and expects to be producing about half a megawatt by December — enough to power about 75 homes.
It's not much in comparison to the hundreds of megawatts produced by geothermal plants on the West Coast. But those operations are built on top of or next to natural hot springs.
Texas does not have those kinds of formations. What it does have are more 500,000 oil and gas wells drilled since 1960.
“Some of our (oil) fields produce 10 times more water than oil,” said Jacques Beaudry-Losique , deputy assistant secretary for renewable energy at the Energy Department. “Some of it comes back pretty hot.”
Outside Victoria is a 41/2-mile-deep well with water at a recorded temperature of 510 degrees Fahrenheit, more than twice the boiling point. If exposed to the surface, the water would explode.
Along the Texas Coast are similar wells at slightly cooler temperatures but at thousands of pounds of pressure and capable of spewing continuous jets of brine hundreds of feet into the air.
It is that energy that Alcorn wants to tap. He envisions thousands of wells across Texas producing thousands of megawatts of clean power 24 hours a day.
Unlike wind and solar energy that's dependent on the weather, geothermal can produce power round the clock without fluctuation. The power generation also can be close to places where demand is high, making it more efficient than wind turbines that have to transmit power hundreds of miles.
Sologen Systems, a renewable energy development company in San Antonio, is betting on the abandoned wells of South and East Texas. It estimates they could produce 100 megawatts in 12 months — as soon as it secures funding.
But investors are cautious about the new technology, Sologen President Frank Smith said. They want assurance it will work and be profitable.
“You want to be on the cutting edge,” Smith said. “Not the bleeding edge.”
From late 1989 until early 1990, the Energy Department ran a demonstration plant at an old well on the Pleasant Bayou East near Houston that pumped out a steady megawatt of power. While clean and reliable, the energy was too expensive at the time to be marketable and the plant was shut down.
With the improvements in generators and the rising cost of energy, Alcorn believes the power now is marketable and has found investors to back his demonstration project.
“I feel like I'm wildcatting again,” Alcorn said. “I feel like I am out there taking the risks that no one else is taking.”
The person who figures out how to get that reliable clean energy to market cheaply will stand to make millions.
“My dad told me, ‘When you flip the switch, I want to be there,'” Alcorn said.
The United States Department of Energy (DOE) established a geopressured-geothermal energy program in the mid 1970's as one response to America's need to develop alternate energy resources in view of the increasing dependence on imported fossil fuel energy. This program continued for seventeen years and approximately two hundred million dollars were expended for various types of research and well testing to thoroughly investigate this alternate energy resource. The main goals of this program were to define the extent of the geopressured reservoirs, determine the technical feasibility of reservoir development including downhole, surface and disposal technologies, establish the economics of production, identify and mitigate adverse environmental impacts, identify and resolve legal and institutional barriers and determine the viability of commercial exploitation of this resource.
Geopressured-geothermal reservoirs occur in the United States most prominently along the northern Gulf of Mexico basin and the Pacific West Coast. Various estimates have been made regarding the recoverable natural gas from the geopressured-geothermal resources of the northern Gulf of Mexico basin and Dorfinan (1988) states that on an average approximately 250Tcf, equivalent to about 137% of known conventional methane reserves in the United States can be potentially extracted from this resource. The DOE program proved that long term high volume brine production was feasible and that gas-extracted brine could be successfully disposed by subsurface injection.
The U.S. Department of Energy’s geopressured-geothermal research program recommended that the ideal situation would involve the development of a total energy system in which all three associated forms of energy - chemical, thermal and mechanical are utilized. This U.S. DOE’S visionary research program has essentially laid the foundations for characterization of this resource and all aspects connected with its development.